Abstract
In the case of Parisi v. Davidson the Supreme Court granted habeas corpus relief to a serviceman who was being court-martialed for disobedience to orders issued after he had been denied administrative discharge on a conscientious objector claim. Professor McCormack analyzes Parisi and uses it as a vehicle to examine the Court's present notions of comity and abstention.
Repository Citation
Wayne McCormack,
Federal Courts Intervention in Military Courts--Interrelationship of Defenses and Comity
(1972),
Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/fac_artchop/43
Georgia Law Review, Vol. 6, No. 3 (1972), pp. 532-562