Abstract
This article considers current proposals for patent law reform in light of a simple theory about intellectual property law: In a world without transactions costs, the assignment of property rights is not necessary to stimulate the optimal production of creative goods. Because potential users of inventions could contract for their creation, a compelling justification for granting property rights in these intangibles is the reduction of real-world transaction and information costs that hinder, or make impossible, contract formation between users and creators. Proposals for patent law reform, therefore, should be evaluated by whether a change in legal rights, or in the regulatory process increases or lowers these costs.
Repository Citation
Paul J. Heald,
Transaction Costs and Patent Reform
(2007),
Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/fac_artchop/552
Santa Clara Computer & High Technology Law Journal, Vol. 23, No. 3 (2006-2007), pp. 447-462. Originally uploaded at SSRN