Harmonizing European Tort Law and the Comparative Method a Review of Basic Questions of Tort Law from a Comparative Perspective (Helmut Koziol ed., Sramek 2015)

Authors

Michael Wells, University of Georgia School of LawFollow

Originally uploaded at SSRN.

Abstract

This is a book review of Basic Questions of Tort Law from a Comparative Perspective, edited by Professor Helmut Koziol. This book is the second of two volumes on “basic questions of tort law.” In the first volume, Professor Helmut Koziol examined German, Austrian, and Swiss tort law. In this volume Professor Koziol has assembled essays by distinguished scholars from several European legal systems as well as the United States and Japan, each of whom follows the structure of Koziol’s earlier book and explains how those basic questions are handled in their own systems.

This review focuses on Professor Koziol’s ultimate aim of harmonization, and on the contribution of these essays to that project. Harmonization of tort law across the member states is not just a matter of working out answers to such questions as the content of the liability rule or whether non-pecuniary harm should be recoverable. Harmonization raises an issue of European Union federalism. That question is not explicitly addressed in either volume, yet the value of the project, and prospects for its success, turn on the answer to it. I argue that Professor Koziol has not made a convincing case for EU displacement of member state tort law.

Repository Citation

Michael Wells, Harmonizing European Tort Law and the Comparative Method a Review of Basic Questions of Tort Law from a Comparative Perspective (Helmut Koziol ed., Sramek 2015) , 9 J. C.L. Stud. 539 (2016),
Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/fac_artchop/1175