Recent SCOTUS decision puts to rest extreme 2020 presidential election claims, confirms state judicial input on states' election rules
Abstract
Hosch Professor & Meigs Distinguished Teaching Professor Lori A. Ringhand, who is an election law expert, offers insight into the U.S. Supreme Court's recent Moore v. Harper decision. “The Supreme Court's recent decision in Moore v. Harper puts to rest some of the more extreme claims made in the 2020 presidential election. It also ensures that states, like Georgia, that protect elections and voting rights in their state constitutions can have confidence that decisions about what those provisions mean will continue to be decided by judges within the state, who are best situated to understand state law.”
Ringhand can be contacted for further commentary at ringhand@uga.edu.
Repository Citation
Communications and Public Relations, Office of, "Recent SCOTUS decision puts to rest extreme 2020 presidential election claims, confirms state judicial input on states' election rules" (2023). Press Releases. 1486.
https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/press_releases/1486